Who is Sigmund Freud?
When the topic of conversation is about socialism, the first name that always comes to mind is Sigmund Freud. His psychoanalysis of every intricate section of the mind of the individual will always make the person reading or studying it to ask more questions and look for more answers. It is like someone asking what to do in Amsterdam. You can choose to have a nice dinner cruise in Amsterdam or pick an Amsterdam canal tour. The choices are limitless. But this is the beauty of the mind. The more discoveries that you see inside the brain, the more questions you ask about it.
Sigmund Freud was born in Freiberg, which is an Austrian Empire. His birth date is May of 1856. He studied as a doctor of medicine and was considered one of the professors in the university. He then lived in Vienna. He wanted to set up his practice in this place but in the 1930s, he left Vienna because of the movement of the Nazis in the area. He then died in the United Kingdom at around 1939.
It was in psychoanalysis that people have come to know Sigmund Freud. He was the one to introduce free association and transference. Some of his notable excerpts from his study are the sexual tendencies of the individual. This means that most of the sexual affinities that people have can already be seen during the infantile forms of an individual. He also had some studies on dreams and how they are an interpretation of the wishes of the person. The dreams are caused by the repressions of different expression of emotions and want of people. It is through dreams that people consciously or unconsciously express what they feel.
Today, psychoanalysis is found to have a decline in the clinic and practice. But they still have some influence on the way doctors and psychologists explain some of the conditions of patients and people in general. But just as it was a century ago, the points of contention by Freud are still being debated up until today. Since the claims that Freud has are all based on the behavior of an individual, it can be quite difficult to prove whether what his findings show are the true form of a person.